Curious how contributors here approach PR descriptions — do you have a template, or is it freeform?
I ask because I'm building a GitHub App that auto-generates PR descriptions from the diff. It reads what actually changed and writes a structured description: what changed, why, how to test, what to watch for.
Before I go further building it — does this solve a real problem for you, or does your team already have a good system?
If you're curious: https://prdraft.carrd.co/ Happy to give early access to anyone who wants to try it.
Jeffrin is inquiring about how teams handle pull request (PR) descriptions, asking if they use templates or a freeform approach. He is developing a GitHub App that auto-generates PR descriptions based on code changes and seeks feedback on its usefulness. Jeffrin offers early access to those interested.