Got it thank you for taking your time to reply this thread.
why not use AI tool on your DB? what concerns you?
what exactly is the kind of RLS management tool you use or prompt you feed AI during debugging?
For your MVP, this stack is solid and keeps ops low. One hard rule: if clients talk directly to Supabase/Data API, then RLS is your security boundary. Don’t treat it as optional. Keep policies boring (row ownership / tenant checks only) and avoid putting “business logic” in RLS. Use a server route/edge function for privileged workflows (athlete OAuth linking, ingestion, admin-like writes) so you’re not forcing RLS to be your backend. Add a real backend (NestJS/Prisma) when you introduce tiers/entitlements, payouts, or ads/SSAI—that’s the complexity breakpoint, not “year 3.”
You need a system-actor path. In the webhook route, how are you creating the Supabase client — anon key, service role, or a server helper with cookies/session?
Claude’s take is directionally right: RLS is great as a safety belt, not as your main “backend brain.” If you put tons of business logic into RLS + scattered edge functions, it gets hard to reason about and debug as complexity grows. Questions for you: 1. Will any client (web/mobile/TV) talk directly to the DB/Data API, or is everything backend-only? 2. Are live + payouts + SSAI in MVP, or “later if it works”? 3. Do you need DRM / tiered entitlements / offline downloads from day 0?
content-range: 0-999/* means the Data API is still enforcing a 1000-row window. This is almost never “propagation delay” — it’s usually that a Range/limit is still being applied somewhere (request headers/client defaults/another environment), or you’re not hitting the instance governed by the setting you changed. Quick checks: 1. Are you using supabase-js PostgREST (from().select()), or a raw REST call / another client? 2. Confirm you changed Max rows on the same project + same environment you’re querying (prod vs staging vs local). Easy to change the wrong one. 3. Paste request + response headers for one failing call (redact auth): • Request: look for Range: (or limit/offset query params) and Prefer: • Response: Content-Range, plus status. If there’s any Range: 0-999 being sent (even implicitly), the server will return exactly 1000 no matter what you expect. If there’s no Range, then we’re dealing with a server-side cap not actually updated / not applied to your endpoint, and the headers will prove it.
Yes unless your DB is truly server-only Rules: If any client (browser/mobile) can hit Supabase (Data API / supabase-js / anon key) → enable RLS (or you’re one config mistake away from leaking rows). If only your backend talks to Postgres via Prisma using a locked-down role and Supabase APIs aren’t exposed → you can skip RLS, but you’re relying on your app as the security boundary (easy to regress later).
Then the short answer is yes — but it’s not “add Clever to Supabase,” it’s federate: Your app does the Clever OAuth login and gets a verified identity (at minimum a stable user id; email helps). Your backend validates Clever’s response (don’t trust the client). Then you either: Link/create a Supabase user for that identity, and issue a Supabase session, or Keep Clever as the only auth and use a backend-only Supabase key to act on behalf of the user (less ideal if you want RLS with auth.uid()).
Yes — if Clever supports OIDC/OAuth, you can wire it up, but it depends on which path you mean: • Do you want “Sign in with Clever” inside Supabase Auth (Clever as an external provider), or • Do you want Clever auth outside Supabase, then your app creates/links a Supabase session?
This pattern (works for ~1h → 401 loop → “reconnect succeeds” but still 401) usually means the client isn’t refreshing / isn’t replacing the token it actually uses (stale token cache), or refresh never fires at all. Hard to tell without one tiny slice of evidence. A few quick checks: Does this happen on Claude Desktop, Web, or both? When you initially connect, does the token response include a refresh_token (yes/no + which fields are present like access_token, expires_in, refresh_token — don’t paste values)? Around the 1h mark: do you see any request to your OAuth token endpoint with grant_type=refresh_token (or similar), or do you only see 401s hitting your GraphQL/MCP endpoints?
Looks like RLS + “user context not actually attached to the SELECT”. With RLS you often get **empty rows** (not an error) when the policy can’t resolve the current user. Two questions (these decide the whole debug path): 1. Where are you calling set_config? 2. What do your RLS policies use to identify the user? try the following ```sql select current_user, session_user, auth.uid() as auth_uid, current_setting('app.current_user_id', true) as app_uid, current_setting('request.jwt.claims', true) as jwt_claims; ``` If `auth.uid()` / `app_uid` is NULL during the failing call, the “rows exist but SELECT returns empty” is expected under RLS.
Yep — the doc is risky/incomplete for Supabase (where RLS is the safety net). Two gotchas: Copy/insert fails until partitions exist (“no partition found”). You must create partitions for the historical range first. Partitions are real tables. If anon/authenticated have GRANTs on child partitions, they can bypass parent RLS → real exposure. Also: pg_partman may not even be installable on hosted Supabase. Check: select installed_version from pg_available_extensions where name='pg_partman'; Check whether you’re exposed: select table_name, grantee, privilege_type from information_schema.role_table_grants where table_schema='public' and grantee in ('anon','authenticated') and table_name like 'messages%'; If child partitions show up there: REVOKE / stop default grants so access goes via the parent + RLS.
That error is expected. You can’t `SET ROLE supabase_admin` or change owners to `supabase_admin` unless you’re actually a member of it. Supabase blocks that. Don’t try to hand ownership to `supabase_admin`. Own it with a role you *do* control (often `postgres`), or create a dedicated owner role. Run this and paste the output: ```sql select current_user, session_user; select n.nspname as schema, p.proname as name, pg_get_function_identity_arguments(p.oid) as args, pg_get_userbyid(p.proowner) as owner from pg_proc p join pg_namespace n on p.pronamespace = n.oid where p.proname in ('upsert_polym_api_creds','get_polym_api_creds','upsert_polym_funder_add'); ``` If these functions must run privileged, the safe pattern is: * owner = role you control * `SECURITY DEFINER` * `SET search_path = ...` (pinned) * `GRANT EXECUTE` only to the roles that should call it Also tell me what tables these functions write to (storage? vault? your own tables?).