Auth

Token Security and Row Level Security


When you enable OAuth 2.1 in your Supabase project, third-party applications can access user data on their behalf. Row Level Security (RLS) policies are crucial for controlling exactly what data each OAuth client can access.

How OAuth tokens work with RLS

OAuth access tokens issued by Supabase Auth are JWTs that include all standard Supabase claims plus OAuth-specific claims. This means your existing RLS policies continue to work, and you can add OAuth-specific logic to create granular access controls.

Token structure

Every OAuth access token includes:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
{ "sub": "user-uuid", "role": "authenticated", "aud": "authenticated", "user_id": "user-uuid", "email": "user@example.com", "client_id": "9a8b7c6d-5e4f-3a2b-1c0d-9e8f7a6b5c4d", "aal": "aal1", "amr": [{ "method": "password", "timestamp": 1735815600 }], "session_id": "session-uuid", "iss": "https://<project-ref>.supabase.co/auth/v1", "iat": 1735815600, "exp": 1735819200}

The key OAuth-specific claim is:

ClaimDescription
client_idUnique identifier of the OAuth client that obtained this token

You can use this claim in RLS policies to grant different permissions to different clients.

Extracting OAuth claims in RLS

Use the auth.jwt() function to access token claims in your policies:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
-- Get the client ID from the token(auth.jwt() ->> 'client_id')-- Check if the token is from an OAuth client(auth.jwt() ->> 'client_id') IS NOT NULL-- Check if the token is from a specific client(auth.jwt() ->> 'client_id') = 'mobile-app-client-id'

Common RLS patterns for OAuth

Pattern 1: Grant specific client full access

Allow a specific OAuth client to access all user data:

1
2
3
4
5
6
CREATE POLICY "Mobile app can access user data"ON user_data FOR ALLUSING ( auth.uid() = user_id AND (auth.jwt() ->> 'client_id') = 'mobile-app-client-id');

Pattern 2: Grant multiple clients read-only access

Allow several OAuth clients to read data, but not modify it:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
CREATE POLICY "Third-party apps can read profiles"ON profiles FOR SELECTUSING ( auth.uid() = user_id AND (auth.jwt() ->> 'client_id') IN ( 'analytics-client-id', 'reporting-client-id', 'dashboard-client-id' ));

Pattern 3: Restrict sensitive data from OAuth clients

Prevent OAuth clients from accessing sensitive data:

1
2
3
4
5
6
CREATE POLICY "OAuth clients cannot access payment info"ON payment_methods FOR ALLUSING ( auth.uid() = user_id AND (auth.jwt() ->> 'client_id') IS NULL -- Only direct user sessions);

Pattern 4: Client-specific data access

Different clients access different subsets of data:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
-- Analytics client can only read aggregated dataCREATE POLICY "Analytics client reads summaries"ON user_metrics FOR SELECTUSING ( auth.uid() = user_id AND (auth.jwt() ->> 'client_id') = 'analytics-client-id');-- Admin client can read and modify all dataCREATE POLICY "Admin client full access"ON user_data FOR ALLUSING ( auth.uid() = user_id AND (auth.jwt() ->> 'client_id') = 'admin-client-id');

Real-world examples

Example 1: Multi-platform application

You have a web app, mobile app, and third-party integrations:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
-- Web app: Full accessCREATE POLICY "Web app full access"ON profiles FOR ALLUSING ( auth.uid() = user_id AND ( (auth.jwt() ->> 'client_id') = 'web-app-client-id' OR (auth.jwt() ->> 'client_id') IS NULL -- Direct user sessions ));-- Mobile app: Read-only access to profilesCREATE POLICY "Mobile app reads profiles"ON profiles FOR SELECTUSING ( auth.uid() = user_id AND (auth.jwt() ->> 'client_id') = 'mobile-app-client-id');-- Third-party integration: Limited data accessCREATE POLICY "Integration reads public data"ON profiles FOR SELECTUSING ( auth.uid() = user_id AND (auth.jwt() ->> 'client_id') = 'integration-client-id' AND is_public = true);

Custom access token hooks

Custom Access Token Hooks work with OAuth tokens, allowing you to inject custom claims based on the OAuth client. This is particularly useful for customizing standard JWT claims like audience (aud) or adding client-specific metadata.

Customizing the audience claim

A common use case is customizing the audience claim for different OAuth clients. This allows third-party services to validate that tokens were issued specifically for them:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
import { serve } from 'https://deno.land/std@0.168.0/http/server.ts'serve(async (req) => { const { user, claims, client_id } = await req.json() // Customize audience based on OAuth client if (client_id === 'mobile-app-client-id') { return new Response( JSON.stringify({ claims: { aud: 'https://api.myapp.com', app_version: '2.0.0', }, }), { headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' } } ) } if (client_id === 'analytics-partner-id') { return new Response( JSON.stringify({ claims: { aud: 'https://analytics.partner.com', access_level: 'read-only', }, }), { headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' } } ) } // Default audience for non-OAuth flows return new Response(JSON.stringify({ claims: {} }), { headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' }, })})

The audience claim is especially important for:

  • JWT validation by third parties: Services can verify tokens were issued for their specific API
  • Multi-tenant applications: Different audiences for different client applications
  • Compliance: Meeting security requirements that mandate audience validation

Adding client-specific claims

You can also add custom claims and metadata based on the OAuth client:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
import { serve } from 'https://deno.land/std@0.168.0/http/server.ts'import { createClient } from 'https://esm.sh/@supabase/supabase-js@2'serve(async (req) => { const { user, claims, client_id } = await req.json() const supabase = createClient(Deno.env.get('SUPABASE_URL')!, Deno.env.get('SUPABASE_SECRET_KEY')!) // Add custom claims based on OAuth client let customClaims = {} if (client_id === 'mobile-app-client-id') { customClaims.aud = 'https://mobile.myapp.com' customClaims.app_version = '2.0.0' customClaims.platform = 'mobile' } else if (client_id === 'analytics-client-id') { customClaims.aud = 'https://analytics.myapp.com' customClaims.read_only = true customClaims.data_retention_days = 90 } else if (client_id?.startsWith('mcp-')) { // MCP AI agents const { data: agent } = await supabase .from('approved_ai_agents') .select('name, max_data_retention_days') .eq('client_id', client_id) .single() customClaims.aud = `https://mcp.myapp.com/${client_id}` customClaims.ai_agent = true customClaims.agent_name = agent?.name customClaims.max_retention = agent?.max_data_retention_days } return new Response(JSON.stringify({ claims: customClaims }), { headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' }, })})

Use these custom claims in RLS:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
-- Policy based on custom claimsCREATE POLICY "Read-only clients cannot modify"ON user_data FOR UPDATEUSING ( auth.uid() = user_id AND (auth.jwt() -> 'user_metadata' ->> 'read_only')::boolean IS NOT TRUE);-- Policy based on audience claimCREATE POLICY "Only specific audience can access"ON api_data FOR SELECTUSING ( auth.uid() = user_id AND (auth.jwt() ->> 'aud') IN ( 'https://api.myapp.com', 'https://mobile.myapp.com' ));

Security best practices

1. Principle of least privilege

Grant OAuth clients only the minimum permissions they need:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
-- Bad: Grant all access by defaultCREATE POLICY "OAuth clients full access"ON user_data FOR ALLUSING (auth.uid() = user_id);-- Good: Grant specific access per clientCREATE POLICY "Specific client specific access"ON user_data FOR SELECTUSING ( auth.uid() = user_id AND (auth.jwt() ->> 'client_id') = 'trusted-client-id');

2. Separate policies for OAuth clients

Create dedicated policies for OAuth clients rather than mixing them with user policies:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
-- User accessCREATE POLICY "Users access their own data"ON user_data FOR ALLUSING ( auth.uid() = user_id AND (auth.jwt() ->> 'client_id') IS NULL);-- OAuth client access (separate policy)CREATE POLICY "OAuth clients limited access"ON user_data FOR SELECTUSING ( auth.uid() = user_id AND (auth.jwt() ->> 'client_id') IN ('client-1', 'client-2'));

3. Regularly audit OAuth clients

Track and review which clients have access:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
-- View all active OAuth clientsSELECT oc.client_id, oc.name, oc.created_at, COUNT(DISTINCT s.user_id) as active_usersFROM auth.oauth_clients ocLEFT JOIN auth.sessions s ON s.client_id = oc.client_idWHERE s.created_at > NOW() - INTERVAL '30 days'GROUP BY oc.client_id, oc.name, oc.created_at;

Testing your policies

Always test your RLS policies before deploying to production:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
-- Test as a specific OAuth clientSET request.jwt.claims = '{ "sub": "test-user-uuid", "role": "authenticated", "client_id": "test-client-id"}';-- Test queriesSELECT * FROM user_data WHERE user_id = 'test-user-uuid';-- ResetRESET request.jwt.claims;

Or use the Supabase Dashboard's RLS policy tester.

Troubleshooting

Policy not working for OAuth client

Problem: OAuth client can't access data despite having a valid token.

Check:

  1. Verify the policy includes the client's client_id
  2. Ensure RLS is enabled on the table
  3. Check for conflicting restrictive policies
  4. Test with service role key to isolate RLS issues
1
2
3
4
5
6
-- Debug: See what client_id is in the tokenSELECT auth.jwt() ->> 'client_id';-- Debug: Test without RLSSET LOCAL role = service_role;SELECT * FROM your_table;

Policy too permissive

Problem: OAuth client has access to data it shouldn't.

Solution: Use AS RESTRICTIVE policies to add additional constraints:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
-- This policy runs in addition to permissive policiesCREATE POLICY "Restrict OAuth clients"ON sensitive_dataAS RESTRICTIVEFOR ALLTO authenticatedUSING ( -- OAuth clients cannot access this table at all (auth.jwt() ->> 'client_id') IS NULL);

Can't differentiate between users and OAuth clients

Problem: Need to apply different logic for direct user sessions vs OAuth.

Solution: Check if client_id is present:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
-- Direct user sessions (no OAuth)CREATE POLICY "Direct users full access"ON user_data FOR ALLUSING ( auth.uid() = user_id AND (auth.jwt() ->> 'client_id') IS NULL);-- OAuth clients (limited access)CREATE POLICY "OAuth clients read only"ON user_data FOR SELECTUSING ( auth.uid() = user_id AND (auth.jwt() ->> 'client_id') IS NOT NULL);

Next steps